PIA employees sacking: non-professional attitude
Termination of 121 employees from Pakistan International Airlines including Pilots, cabin crews and low ranking staff by the
non-professional management has become laughing stock. Another 377 disciplinary
cases were pending against various classes of employees in the PIA for
submitting fake or tampered with educational documents, according to the
airline spokesperson.
On 7th
May the Senate Standing Committee on
Aviation called upon the PIA management.
The committee met for the sixth time to discuss the issue of PIA
employees. Most of the committee members held that terminating staff from
service was a drastic action. The Committee referred to the 12 employees who
were allowed to retain their jobs in 2017. “If PIA took a lenient view for
some, its management should show similar compassion to all its employees and
retain them, instead of laying them off. PIA has a category of minor punishment
which can be handed down to employees possessing fake degrees,” said committee
chairman Senator Mushahidullah Khan of the PML-N.
The PIA management maintained that it is
following Supreme Court orders to take necessary action against staff
possessing fake academic records. But members, especially the chairman, argued
that the SC had not ordered sacking of the staff.
In this regard cases were
pending with the courts where airline management does not bother even to file
its written statement to defend its action. A senior air hostess Samina Saleem Qureshi
(P-549 3), Pakistan International Airlines Public Limited Company (PIACL) filed
a Suit in the court of Senior Civil Judge, Lahore against Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief of Flight Operations and Chief Human Resource Officer, Pakistan
International Airlines. The civil suit was filed for declaration under section
42 of the specific relief act 1887 along with permanent and mandatory
injunction against the impugned dismissal letter dated 27-12-18.
According to Plaintiff the Pakistan International
Airline Training Certificate & Qualification Manual Edition -VI had
prescribed basic requirement for the training and licensing of the newly
recruited Cabin crew with 18 years of minimum age and with a Higher Secondary
School Certificate. She had completed Matriculation (Science) from Government
High School, in 1981, whereas also her HSC examination (Arts) from Government
Women College, Multan in 1984.
She applied for the training of Cabin Crew and
submitted all the necessary documents with the application file including all
educational documents including Matriculation & HSC degrees in 1996. After
complete verification of documents she was issued offer letter to join the
Airline as Airhostess on 10-01-1996. Due to excellent performance the airline
management absorbed her service permanently on 16-07-1996. Later, she was
promoted as Senior Airhostess from PG-IV to PG-V on 29-05-2008. She was also
awarded with number of appreciation letters by the management during her
excellent professional flying career.
The Plaintiff submitted that the new management of
the PIALC who had taken over illegally and unlawfully in the month of November
2018, without any lawful authority and approval of the Federal Government in
order to facilitate their blue-eyed Cabin Crew from other airlines started to
harass the regular Cabin crew of the PIACL. She, being an active and regular
member of PACCA raised her voice against the illegal appointments and acts of
the defendants, whereas the defendants threatened that if she did not stop
protesting against them, she will face serious consequences and may even be
terminated from the service of the PIALC.
However, without any fear she continued rising her
voice for the rights of the Cabin crew. She was also performing her duties
peacefully in legal manners, whereas the defendants without any complaint,
issued show-cause notice against her that she had submitted a B.A Degree sheet
at the time of hiring in PIALC on 03-04-2014.
Samina rejected the allegations leveled in
show-cause notice and categorically declared that she had never submitted any
B.A degree sheet to the defendants except Matriculation and HSC degree sheet at
the time of induction. She was selected as Cabin crew in the airline on HSC
basis. Hence, she was never required to appear in B.A examination.
The defendants issued the impugned dismissal letter
against her and she was dismissed from the service of PIACL on 27-12-2018. During
the course of inquiry the defendants never produced the allegedly claimed
submitted B.A degree and simply reliance in the air, hence the allegation of
the defendants have no value in the eyes of law, Plaintiff Samina submitted
before the court.
She added that the procedure followed by defendants
to issue the impugned dismissal letter dated 27-12-2018 was in violation of
PIACL service rules and regulations. According to rules a show-cause notice is served
to the accused and within fifteen days from receipt of notice, the accused has
to reply in written form. Thereafter, within 7 days the competent authority has
to satisfy or dissatisfy the reply submitted by the accused. If the authority
considers that further investigation is required in light of the reply
submitted by accused, the authority shall have to call for notice of inquiry
within 15 days of submission of reply by accused. Otherwise the show-cause
notice becomes in fructuous and collapsed.
Samina alleged that defendants wanted to hire the
Cabin crew from other airlines. Whereas as per judgment passed by apex court of
Pakistan 2013 SCMR 352, the management of the PIACL cannot use the phrase
contract in the future appointments, where this illegal act of defendants is
being challenged by the plaintiff hence the impugned letter is issued to her.
After
various dates the civil court issued arrest warrants for four top officers of
the Pakistan International Airline (PIA) in the contempt of court case. The
court issued bail-able warrants for officers who didn’t turn up before the
court carrying progress report of the court orders. The arrest orders were
issued by civil judge Muhammad Akram Azad who was also hearing Samina’s
petition. The warrants were issued for CEO PIA Arshad Malik, Director Flight
Operations Captain Aziz Khan, Chief Human Resource Officer Air vice Marshal Subhan
Wazir and Chief Pilot Captains Ali Zaman.
On
April 17, 2019, Session Court suspended
arrest warrants. The court issued a notice to PIA top officers which sought
replies from parties on April 20 while hearing a petition filed against
issuance of arrest warrants. The petition stated that the civil judge issued
the warrants against law and facts. The officers were facing charges of not
restoring Captain Mian Shehzad on his post despite the court orders. The
petitioner had challenged his suspension in the civil court.
-By Nasir Mahmood
What a covered story 100 % truth well done.
ReplyDeleteThanks....
DeleteIntense in its opportunities for building confidence, and intense in its opportunities for dealing with doubt and fear. And it's this intensity of often-conflicting experience that makes travelling alone for an extended period of time an absolute necessity for each and every one of us.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.travelco.pk/